📖LPDfi
LPDfi protocol, utilizing DEXs such as Uniswap, enables the minting and trading of derivatives, futures and options, 24/7 without relying on any counterparties like brokerage firms or market makers. The following section will highlight and delve deeper into the four main features of the LPDfi protocol.
The Key Features of LPDfi Protocol
LPDfi involves no counterparty risk, meaning that no entities like brokerage firms or market makers are involved.
Anyone can create markets for derivatives such as futures and options for any asset pair, without needing permission by leveraging permission-less DEX protocols like Uniswap.
Liquidity Providers (LPs) can expect higher returns by providing liquidity through the LPDfi protocol, as it is used for executing futures and options.
LPDfi protocol allows for flexible settings of various parameters, such as liquidation risks, oracle dependencies, leverage settings, and maturity dates unlike traditional centralized exchanges.
No Counterparty Risk
In traditional financial markets, particularly in derivatives and credit markets, managing counterparty risk is extremely important. This risk involves the possibility that one party in a transaction may not fulfill their contractual obligations. In derivative protocols using Automated Market Makers (AMMs), transactions are automatically executed via smart contracts, which eliminates the concern for counterparty risk.
Looking at the options trading, the process is as follows:
Option Purchase: Investor A buys the right to purchase ETH at a predetermined price on a future date from Investor B.
Option Exercise: If, at the deadline, the price of ETH is above the exercise price, it benefits investor A to exercise the option and buy ETH at the agreed price.
In this trading flow, Counterparty Risk arises if investor B is unable or refuses to provide ETH on the day of the option exercise. While investor A has the right to exercise the option, if investor B fails to deliver ETH as per the contract, A cannot exercise the right, missing the opportunity for profit.
In DeFi derivatives protocols, risks that may arise are managed through smart contracts. For instance, if a transaction has a maximum potential loss of $100, that amount is secured as a margin in advance. In cases of transactions that could lead to infinite losses, margin requirements are automatically enforced by smart contracts, thus eliminating the risk.
Permissionless and Non-Custodial
Permissionless
AMMs provide a unique feature allowing for the listing of any ERC20 token. Using this feature, LPDfi protocols can support various token pairs and offer a wide range of financial products like futures and options. In contrast, traditional centralized exchanges face challenges in listing 99% of tokens due to strict regulatory requirements and complex trading setups.
Non-Custodial
LPDfi can offer a significant advantage by giving users complete control over their digital assets. All user’s assets are managed on chain via transparent, verified smart contracts.
Higher Returns for Liquidity Providers
By providing liquidity to the LPDfi protocol, liquidity providers can expect improved returns. In most LPDfi protocols, the position of a Liquidity Provider is represented as an ERC1155 token, allowing flexible utilization of the provider's assets. Meanwhile, Uniswap V3 represents LP tokens as ERC721 (NFTs). In option protocols like Panoptic or Dopex, liquidity providers lend their assets to option traders and receive premiums in return. Unborrowed tick positions continue to earn DEX fees. This is expected to mitigate significant risks for liquidity providers, such as Impermanent Loss (IL) and Loss of Value Risk (LVR).
Flexible Design in protocol leveraging DEX
LPDfi protocol allows for flexible settings of various parameters enabling users to tailor settings to their specific needs. This flexibility encompasses the management of liquidation risks, dependence on oracles, adjustments in leverage, and the selection of maturity dates. This customizable approach stands in stark contrast to the rigid structures often encountered in traditional centralized exchanges, thereby providing a more dynamic and user-responsive trading environment.
For example,
Oracle-Free
The LPDfi protocol allows for price discovery without relying on oracles by utilizing DEXs. It also enables more flexible designs concerning leverage and liquidation by utilizing the provided liquidity positions. Some DeFi derivatives use oracles, which have risks of manipulation and often depend on data from centralized exchanges, showing their vulnerability. These factors highlight the significance of using AMMs in the derivatives market.
Leverage and Liquidation
By integrating AMMs, LPDfi introduces an advanced system for leverage and liquidation, offering both versatility and precision. This innovative framework enables users to partake in perpetual options trading with up to 10x leverage, and in perpetual futures trading with leverage that can extend up to 1000x. This substantial leverage amplifies potential profits, but it is crucial to note that it also significantly increases the potential risks involved. This strategic enhancement diversifies the trading landscape, equipping users with a trading framework that is both adaptable and responsive to market needs. Let’s illustrate this with an example of an 'InfinityPools':
Suppose a user provides liquidity to an ETH-USDC pair at $1,000. This liquidity is placed at a $900 price tick. A trader wants to build a long-leveraged position on ETH. In InfinityPools, the trader borrows the LP token provided by the liquidity provider, which is 1,000 USDC, using 100 USDC as margin, and exchanges it for 1 ETH. This is equivalent to trading with 10x leverage. Now, consider three scenarios:
Scenario 1: If the price of ETH reaches $1,200, the trader swaps 0.83 ETH for 1,000 USDC and returns it to the liquidity provider, keeping the remaining 0.17 ETH as profit.
Scenario 2: If ETH's price drops to $901, the trader swaps 1 ETH for USDC, but since the current price of ETH is $901, they are short by 99 USDC. Hence, the initially deposited collateral of $100 is used.
Scenario 3: If the price of ETH falls to $500, the trader returns ETH to the liquidity provider. Since the current price is below $900, dropping to $500, the token to be returned changes from USDC to ETH. The LP's position, initially provided at $900 for 1,000 USDC, equates to about 1.11 ETH. Since the trader holds 1 ETH, they need to acquire an additional 0.11 ETH.
This shows that regardless of ETH's price changes, only $100 collateral is needed. To achieve higher leverage, traders borrow liquidity closer to the current price. Continuing with the assumption, if a trader borrows 1,000 USDC provided at $999, and swaps 1 ETH at a rate of 999 USDC, in case of a price drop, they need to return 1.001 ETH. Here, a collateral of just $1 is sufficient.
Last updated